Respect

On Heroes

blog image

Pace David Bowie, and in the light of the hagiography building in some quarters around the late Steve Jobs, one wonders who are the real enduring, beyond "just for one day" heroes, ancient and modern?

A good candidate from my childhood is Alexander the Great, from the moment I first shed a tear when reading in a Ladybird history book (a constant companion, and part of a set which I preserve with fondness and gratitude to this day) about Alexander dying (at just 33, thereby giving him a special bond with Jesus in my young mind) "far from his homeland".  As a long-standing, albeit non-heroic exile from my own homeland, this still resonates...

Of course, many have tried to dispel the aura around Alexander; the latest being historian Mary Beard in a new biography.  She may be correct in her analysis, but how do we want our heroes, godly like Galahad, or flawed and vital like Lancelot, Alexander (or, for that matter, for today's unhistorical acolytes, Jobs) and the rest?

Equally, and more prosaically, there are many others, in many walks of life, not heroes as such, but people nonetheless whose achievements and interests might be satisfying to try and emulate, even to a small degree.  One such is polymath Melvyn Bragg.

Identifying humans’ complex relationship with water

blog image

A new book argued that we need to treat the world’s finite water supplies with deep respect and that in the long term, for all our vaunted technologies, many of the solutions and pathways to sustainability lie in making water conservation an integral part of everyone’s lives.

On Ancestors

IconSocietal 

Ancestors1

What if we could we remember and honour all the dead...yes, the estimated 110 billion or so humans who have ever lived? 

Of course, our most urgent challenge right now is to keep working towards the goal of giving everyone alive right now access to basic needs - to water and food, security, health, education etc - and it's painfully clear that, with e.g. growing numbers of orphans around the world, we still have a huge task still ahead of us.  (And yes, let's unashamedly say "us", rather than fall back on the third person, abstract term "humanity" that somehow suggests it's someone else's problem.)

However, what if at the same time, everyone - all 7 billion of us alive now - were allocated, at random (to encourage diversity and understanding) 20 "ancestors" about whom we would try and find out something - a name, a likely lifespan or job etc. - and for whom we would light a candle, wear a poppy, say a prayer...whatever...how much more might we feel part of the same family, regardless of race, creed or gender?

For this, we'd need to start by joining up all the records, histories and anthropological studies that give us clues about our ancestors.

Syndicate content